Response to TV Show Viewers: Post 1 - January 23, 2026
Response to TV Show Viewers: Post 53 - May 27, 2026
Warning:
Soapbox Rant Up Ahead
Making
both American Rehab Charleston and Restoring Charleston was a cool
experience that spanned three years of our lives. And with streaming TV, it’s
lasted longer than most could have expected, which has been a neat surprise.
I
suppose, what I’m stepping into here, along with pointing out my own awareness,
is educating in the form of some reassurance or alternate view to those on the home
improvement television side. If you don’t have a big budget, there’s another
way. And in the end, it might just be the best road to excellence.
Early
on, someone mentioned having the secret sauce, how this was needed to make a
show that documented the renovation of a house, and that producers of ARC would
be ready to pour on this goop. In my opinion, authenticity is the most important
ingredient for this sort of recipe, and the more of that sprinkled or even dumped
in and on, the better. However, not everyone is pitching their tent in this camp.
As
we filmed the test reel, I said something I believe wholeheartedly. I think Charleston,
South Carolina is proof that my statement was and still is valid. It was previously
thought out, shared within a post on this blog long before I’d even started speaking to the networks. And this likely
helped this conviction roll off my tongue easily while I was being recorded. In
part, this remark, and the attitude and honesty that went with it, helped to
get me the initial four-episode series. I explained how the Holy City had put
in the effort to save its old homes and buildings, leading to all the attention
that it has been given, and subsequently the tourist dollars that come with it.
And the point I made then, what I’m getting to now, is that it wasn’t easy, but
it was worth it. In my opinion, what I said in the clip that was eventually
included in the pilot episode, was that what Charleston has worked hard to
preserve is “better than brand new.”
I
have lived in older homes that someone else renovated. I have also lived in project
houses that I have reworked myself top to bottom. I’ve called new construction that
others built my home too. But I’ve also been able to move into a home I
designed and oversaw, starting with foundations I dug, and engineered with rebar
I tied myself. Now I subbed out the big scopes, but it was my plan and I managed
it start to finish, same as my own rehabs in most cases. Through this I’ve come
to understand that I prefer to live in a home that’s been renovated, and ideally,
one I’ve worked on and throughout myself. That’s the best scenario, at least
for me.
This
is all being spelled out here and now because of my experiences renovating my
houses for television and what I grew to understand, what I see as the value, the
TV gold, that is authenticity. This is my opinion, but it’s a seed that was
planted back in 2013 by the production director and it blossomed somewhere after.
The network encouraged me to just be myself, a continuation of where I’d
settled while filming the test reel. But they hired a production company that
had a different take, knowing how hard that sort of television creation is. And
if done wrong, more of a truer documentary style filming and producing can be a
budget gobbler. Ringing close to that tone captured in the introductory episode
of ARC, authenticity in home rehab TV isn’t easy, but it’s worth it. And in my
view, it’s better than something plotted out and assembled creatively, yet inorganically.
I
had glimpses of the production side. But it was here and there by way of breaks
and gaps. I witnessed and certainly benefited from an extraordinary amount of pre-planning.
As I’ve already mentioned, yet perhaps inadequately, this was all quite
impressive and something I saw as extraordinary. It could be said that this was
all needed for things to run smoothly, and I don’t disagree. But the case could
also be made, that this effort toward scheduling and coordinating, were means to
the ends equated to justifications for money allotted, more than an honest to
goodness necessity.
Genuineness
for a TV show about a home being saved, reborn, needs people with experience doing
this sort of documenting and storytelling. And that team must have eyes and
ears ready to pivot when something is discovered in the walls or when a neighbor
or local preservationist introduces some attention-grabbing history. These are blessed
gifts if they’re used. But when ignored due to a time crunch created by the
demands of preapproved talking points, then it’s like tossing a handcrafted door
to be replaced by an off-the-shelf hollow core or taking a sledgehammer to antique
brick work to make way for concrete block or modern tile. Planning and prepping
for what will happen is surely easier than the effort required to accept the unexpected,
but as I see it, not superior.
I
can understand how someone might think that reality is expensive. But that’s a larger
issue when the right experience is absent. People who know when to start
watching closely and how to spot what can be used, from doing it and being in there—that
can be the nuggets that pay viewers back heartily for watching. The proof is in
the pudding, the realization that it’s either a wash or a money saver. Yet, if you
don’t have the confidence of stumbling onto the amazing, yet-to-be-discovered
unknowns, you will most likely wince at the thought of this approach, considering
it too much of a risk.
Authentic home rehabbing TV is not easy, but it’s worth it and in my view, that tactic is better than fashioned spontaneity.
Response to TV Show Viewers: Post 56 - Coming Soon

No comments:
Post a Comment